corvideye: (Default)
I read a lot more books this year than in 2010... a definite inverse corollary to writing less and seeking more escapism and/or inspiration.

Bold = recommended
* = best

8 Aubrey-Maturin books )
****
Knowing how much I like O’Brian, [livejournal.com profile] ceruleanfleur recommended Naomi Novik's Temeraire series, whose premise is Napoleonic wars + dragons:  the sentient dragons bond with their captain and are flown into combat with a crew in the manner of Man o'war ships.

Temeraire series )

In sum: I thought the first 3 or 4 books in the series were a fun entertaining read, perfect for a plane trip or a day at the beach, but later the author seemed unable to fully pull off the situations she had set up.

****

*The Passion of Artemisia by Susan Vreeland. A novel told from the pov of late-Renaissance painter Artemisia Gentilleschi. Aside from O’Brian, this was probably the best book I read in 2011. It's what Girl with a Pearl Earring tried to be, but didn’t convincingly pull off: a beautiful evocation of a painter’s mind and heart. It depicts a character very rarely seen in fiction: an artist who lives a fulfilling life. Artemisia transcends a terrible trauma in her youth and pursues a moving struggle to earn recognition in a male-dominated world, and to balance her roles as artist, wife, and mother. The book is magnificent in terms of researched detail, but above all Vreeland captures the artistic thought process, the development of ideas, the obsessive passion of an artist for their work: joyful or painful, it is what they must do.

The Miracles of Prato by Laurie Albanese and Laura Morowitz. Okay, but not great. It’s very similar in setting and subject to Artemisia (Italian Rennaissance painters, redemption of a molested woman), but nowhere near as well written or characterized. I don’t find this version of Fra Filippo sympathetic or dimensional (he never felt like a character in his own right, just a slot in the story: poof, instant passionate artist /devoted lover!). I felt sorry for his lover/muse Lucrezia, but she isn’t all that interesting. The authors never penetrate what would make an artist’s inspiration tick on the inside... never get past the beauty of the woman in the paintings to unveil any depths within.  Lucrezia is young, innocent, loving, and pretty... that’s it.  The book is not as effective as Artemisia in turning historical details into narrative; there is a tendency to infodump and tell rather than show characterization, and villains are one-dimensional. Still, they do a reasonably good job creating events and motivations to fill in between the known facts.

*Scent of the Missing by Susannah Charleson.  A compelling memoir of a volunteer canine search and rescue team.   Anyone interested in forensic crime or human and animal psychology should definitely read this ([livejournal.com profile] shiningmoon, I'm looking at you!).  Charleson writes with wonderfully vivid and exact description that can be hilarious or fascinating, showing an impressive acuity of observation (which makes sense given the type of work she does).  She makes the various dogs’ personalities really clear and vivid (more so than the people, actually!). I’m impressed by her candor in revealing her struggles to bond with and discipline her dog, and in showing how few of their searches end with a tidy, satisfying conclusion... how few have any conclusion at all.  Yet the life and the work go on. 

Bachelor Brothers’ Bed and Breakfast by Bill Richardson. Pleasant persiflage, nicely phrased vignettes, though completely drama- and plot-free.

Bone vol. 5-9 by Jeff Smith (graphic novel). The epic fantasy and mythology really kicks into high gear in these volumes, though still interspersed with some of the playful slapstick that dominates the earlier parts. Bone is an impressive story, expertly told, multi-textured and deeply felt.

The Color of Earth and The Color of Water by Dong Hwa Kim.  Lovely and lyrical Korean manwha (graphic novels). Delicate, poetic coming of age and romance of a mother and daughter in traditional Korea. The setting atmospherics are incredibly exquisite, the trees and weather as beautifully rendered as in an antique scroll.  I look forward to reading the third installment.

The Lovely Bones by Alice Sebold. I picked this up out of idle curiosity, because when I first started going to writers’ conferences, this was the big Breakout Novel everyone was talking about. Sure enough, I read the first couple pages and couldn’t put it down. This is not my usual kind of book, and the serial killer aspect makes it an uneasy read for me, creating images I’d rather not have in my head; I don’t know if I’d want to read it again. But it is awfully well written...insightful and filled with detail so exact it makes you sit up in your chair in recognition.  It is a story of expertly crafted suspense interwoven with the thoughtful, poignant examination of how grief injures and alters a family.  I was dissatisfied with the ending, though.

*Tao te Ching by Lao Tzu, translated by Ursula Le Guin. An astonishing rendition of the classic work. Simple, clear, deep, like still water. I am still reading it and will continue reading it; I need to read from this every day. This slim volume contains a lifetime of wisdom that, if grasped, could lift the mind free of so much suffering.

***
The Illumination by Kevin Brockmeier. I have mixed feelings about this book: it is so brilliantly conceived and written, and yet so harrowing and painful that I kept not being sure if I could finish reading it. (I finally did, but it took real effort.) It is an in-depth exploration of physical and emotional pain in all its tragic variety.  

The book is not truly a novel, rather an interlinked series of stories developed around a magic realism premise. It unlocks a mesmerizing visual metaphor: what if our pain was visible in the form of light that radiated from our bodies? One day this change inexplicably happens, and everyone in the world can see the evidence of everyone else’s injuries and illnesses, from stubbed toes to cancer. Brockmeier explores this premise with astonishing invention, coming up with endlessly varied ways to describe the effect. Amid this, the stories follow a trail of lives affected by an object:  the notebook of endearments written by a man to his dead wife. Lives are altered, redirected, destroyed, or uplifted by their brush with this notebook.

The prose is absolutely astonishing, the kind of exquisitely observed detail that makes me feel like I’ve been sleep-walking with my own writing. This is how I wanted to write when I first set out to do it, to exalt the ordinary with this painful acuity of observation. It is writing that takes my breath away, makes my mouth fall open in recognition and pained sympathy and surprise:  so intense, so extraordinary, searing, blazing, savage, harsh, gorgeous, haunting.

It is a book full of agonized wonders... everyone cherishing pain that is no longer secret from the world.  The problem is that no one’s life is going to work out. The characters’ pain is transcendant, but they will not transcend their pain. 
***

Memory by Linda Nagata. Both fascinating and frustrating. At first impressive, depicting a complete, distinct culture with its own mores and terms, a strange artificial nanotech-infused world whose inhabitants have forgotten their own origins. But somehow the setting is more vivid and engrossing than the characters; they’re bloodless, lacking distinctive personality. In 400 pages all I could tell you about the MC is that she’s stubborn and reckless, and asks a few too many rhetorical questions. There is never any love conveyed between her and her fated lover; we’re just informed there is passion. The plot has some missing gaps in cause and effect. After a lot of build-up that seems like it will lead to answers, there is never a full explanation of the mysterious world origin, just inference; a lot of its aspects never do make sense. That could maybe work in a fantasy novel, but the persistent hard SF label made me want more hard explanation. I still might look at her other books, though... she has interesting ideas, and paints a vivid scene.

The Oracle of Stamboul by Michael Lukas. Beautifully visualized, full of wonderful detail in the exotic setting of 19th c. Turkey, the emergence of an intriguingly precocious and gifted girl ... but I felt the author chickened out on his premise, or didn’t know how to fully realize it; the story ended abruptly and unsatisfyingly, the MC’s fascinating potential never achieved.  Still worth reading for the evocative imagery, a nice escape into another time and place.

The Lace Reader by Brunonia Barry. I had mixed feelings about it, kind of wish I hadn’t read it. It’s an eerie, unsettling novel of psychological suspense, mingled (not always successfully) with quirky social satire. At first it seems like a standard, even banal chick-lit setup: an eccentric family in small-town Mass. uncovering the dark secrets hidden in their past; a variety of weird townsfolk; an unexpected death that might be a murder. But the story is gradually revealed to be something much stranger, involving divination, precognition, mental illness, and above all an unreliable narrator whose fundamental perception of reality comes into question. It’s never possible to completely piece the events together or reconcile the versions... Overall I found it more unsettling than satisfying, but it definitely was thought-provoking.  ([livejournal.com profile] shiningmoon, you might like this one better than I did.)

 The Lace Reader is told in the present tense, something which seems to be in vogue right now and which I generally dislike.  Partly it's just that it often seems pointless, a gimmicky way to be different.  But I think it also tends to camouflage lazy writing, allowing a lot of ordinarily unacceptable to-be verbs and passive voice to slip under the radar.  And because present tense is traditionally used for picture captions, stage directions, and synopses, I feel it creates a static effect in a story, a lack of the momentum that arises from knowing an event has occurred, an action has been completed.  One of the only books I've seen where I think present tense narration was logical and successful is The Time Traveller's Wife; because that story shifts constantly in time, sorting out past tense would have been utterly confusing.

******
Re-read:

5 Chanur books by C. J. Cherryh. I never get tired of those; always a rousing good read.

*Pere Goriot by Balzac. This was on my list of books to re-read so I could decide if I still need to own it.  I read it in college and could remember only that I had liked it more than the average assigned book.  I'm so glad I gave it another try; it's excellent, and now I want to read more of his novels!   Balzac's scathing, mordant wit skewers and dissects the foibles and failings of Paris highlife and lowlife, detailing their indiscretions with piercing acuity. It is surprisingly modern in feel, yet at the same time, nobody constructs novels this way now.  For instance, his leisurely opening includes many pages describing the decrepit boarding house where the story is set.  Modern editors would say cut all this, you can't have pages of description with no dialogue and no characters!  Yet the passage is hilariously entertaining and informatively evocative of middle class tastlessness.  How happy for us that Balzac wasn't saddled with a modern editor.

************
Started to read but gave up on:

Changing Planes by UK Le Guin. One of very few Le Guin books I don’t like. I started to read it when it first came out, gave up on it. This year I gave it another try, still don’t like it. It consists of dry little mental games and anthropological sketches; they have occasional tidbits of insight/ interest, but are not really stories; there is scant emotional engagement.

Murther and Walking Spirits by Robertson Davies. Starts off in fine Davies form, mordant and funny. But once the dead character begins watching 'movies' about the past lives of his ancestors, I got bored... It's another case where present tense narration creates a lack of momentum, and because the narrator describes stories that he watches rather than experiences, it's like reading a synopsis instead of being fully engaged with the characters’ pov.  Also, because each chapter deals with different characters, I found it hard to get invested in any of them.
***

I note that a lot of my reading this year was influenced by the free Advance Reading Copies available at work.  Lovely Bones, Oracle of Stampoul, Artemisia, Miracles of Prato, The Illumination, and the Lace Reader all came from that vector.
corvideye: (Default)
I am further astonished at how few books I read this year (I read ca. 4x as many in 2009!). One big reason is that I spent a lot more hours productively writing, thus less time seeking distraction/ inspiration/ entertainment, and also less time seeking reassurance from others' stories. Still, reading is an absolutely vital source of fuel for my creativity, so getting enough fiction fodder is important to me. Almost all of my major writing streaks have been catalyzed by something I read.

I also read more books in 2009 because I discovered some very enjoyable long series (Robin Hobb’s 6 Farseer and 3 Ship of Magic books, Patrick O’Brian’s many Aubrey-Maturin novels), whereas in 2010 I didn’t encounter anything so compelling. Another factor is that in the last two years I’ve discovered a lot of great webcomics (which I’ll review in another post), so apparently I’m getting more of my entertainment from those sources.

********************
*=best; bold = recommended

*Tales from Outer Suburbia by Shaun Tan. Again*, astonishing. Who is this guy, and how can I be more like him? How has he remained so deeply and directly in touch with his inner child in all its aspects, both charming and unsettling? Magnificently original art and writing, by turns eerie and touching. Very highly recommended. (*cf. The Arrival)

*Fingersmith by Sarah Waters. Dickensian Gothic erotic suspense with Rashomon-style twists of perspective. Good stuff; dark, twisted, and fascinating. Waters truly nails the voice of the period, and pulls off an impressive series of four surprise reversals of the plot. Thanks to ceruleanfleur for recommending; I want to read more by this author, and see the BBC adaptation.

The Ionian Mission by Patrick O’Brian. In 2009 I hugely enjoyed the first several books of the Aubrey-Maturin Napoleonic Wars series, but this one did not seem at all unified, and did not draw me as much.

Strangers in Paradise: Love and Lies (graphic novel). Good stuff, a section of the story I had missed.  Part of an outstanding series.

The Yiddish Policemen’s Union by Michael Chabon. I ambivalently recommend this. The prose is brilliant, the premise is intriguingly bizarre (a detective noir set in an alternate universe where a post-WW II Jewish homeland was founded in Alaska), so one can’t help being curious about it, but the story is damned slow, unappealingly gloomy, and annoyingly inconclusive. It reminds me of Dirk Gently, but not as funny—a shambling absurdist screwup aimlessly pursuing a murder case that remains bizarre to the last. I adore Chabon’s masterpiece, The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay, but none of his other novels have ever done it for me.

A River in the Sky by Elizabeth Peters. Completely disappointing, the only Peabody book I can recall being bored by. I hope that is a fluke, not a trend.

Re-read:
Port Eternity by C. J. Cherryh. I last read it in High School, so gave it another try. My recollection stands: not one of her better novels. Arthurian archetypes in space; repetitive and thinly characterized.

(part of) *Terrier by Tamora Pierce. I returned to this as narrative reassurance, at a point of insecurity with my own writing. A solid chewy gritty engaging fantasy; I think it’s one of her best.

Nonfiction
*Manhood for Amateurs by Michael Chabon (essays). Given my lack of interest in reading nonfiction lately (other than instruction/ research), I was surprised at how much I enjoyed this—far more than his recent novels, to be sure. A hugely enjoyable read; fun, hilarious, profound, poignant, sarcastic, insightful, fearlessly revealing, and, as ever, brilliantly phrased with an acuity and originality that makes me feel hackneyed and unoriginal... Simply excellent stuff. If you’ve ever had the feeling that you’re only masquerading as an adult, or as a parent, then read this.

Sometimes the Magic Works - writing technique /autobio essays by fantasy author Terry Brooks. (I’ve never read any of his fiction.) An accurate portrayal of the writing brain, though it doesn’t offer any deep insights, to my perspective; I think it would be more revelatory for beginning writers. Mostly it’s just interesting to find kernels of recognition between my brain/ process and that of a successful author: not new information, just a sense of confirmation: yes, it is that way; yes, that can work professionally. For a fantasy superstar, Brooks is humble and down to earth, as I remember from seeing him at a con. He openly acknowledges the huge role that luck played in his success.

(parts of) *Knitting Rules! by Stephanie Pearl-McPhee. Warm, funny, reassuring, useful. This book taught me to successfully knit socks, and is lots of fun to read.  Recommended to me by elfie_chan.

Started to read, gave up on:

Treason’s Harbor by Patrick O’Brian - I’ll come back to this, I just kept getting distracted before I got fully into it.

Dragon Keeper by Robin Hobb - 150 pages in, I still didn’t care where it was going or what happened to the characters. It’s competently constructed, it’s just not any fun to read, freighted with endless dreary internal monologues. Very disappointing, given how much I enjoyed her stellar Farseer series.

Deerskin by Robin McKinley. She certainly captures fairy tale high style, but that doesn’t work so well at novel length. I’ve never seen so much telling (vs. showing) in my life... pages and pages that read like a character outline, not a novel.

The Bonesetters’ Daughter by Amy Tan. I found the historical Chinese part interesting but depressingly tragic, and the modern American part tediously mundane. I’m just not into modern realism!

Fragile Things by Neil Gaiman (short stories). I tried five, found them all pointless and unappealing. None of them really give you access to a character, a personality. I loved Sandman, but so far, I have not liked Gaiman’s prose fiction, which I realize makes me a pariah in fantasy geekdom. (I don’t like A Song of Ice and Fire, either. I know, heresy!)

Gentlemen of the Road by Michael Chabon.  I was hugely excited by the idea of Chabon tackling this period. Someday, I devoutly hope someone will write an epic historical novel about medieval Khazaria. But sadly, this ain’t it.

Instead, this seems to be Chabon kicking back from his usual Weighty Themes and goofing off with a purplescent evocation of Robert E. Howard, H. Rider Haggard, and other Golden Age overwrought pulp. Only a writer as skilled as Chabon could get away with such outrageous, audacious sentences ... kids, don’t try this at home.  But here, the bold magnificence of his sentences distracts from what he is actually saying. When you get to descriptions like ‘an archipelago of turds’, it’s clear that he’s playing around, taking the literary equivalent of a romp at the beach. It’s a gleeful indulgence, but perhaps not a story that sticks with you.

I’ll probably still give this one more try, but the endless baroque embellishment of every single phrase started getting on my nerves. He has distinctly drawn characters, but they’re cartoonish, with no sense of what makes them tick.  It was all very exuberant, but it didn't make me care.
corvideye: (Default)
I was shocked and amazed to discover that I only saw 4 movies in a theater in 2010 (Avatar for the second time, Inception twice, and Salt). I love movies, and I love seeing them on the big screen, but apparently my viewing habits succumbed to the combo of Mary (my main movie buddy) moving out of town, and a lack of new releases that really interested me—and perhaps also the convenience of Netflix. It is odd to find that one is unwittingly, unintentionally part of a cultural trend...

* = best ones, bold = recommended

The best new (to me) movie I saw this year was definitely *Inception (2x). My, my, yes, Christopher Nolan is certainly earning my respect as the premier speculative fiction filmmaker of the day. Like The Prestige, Inception is another clever, intricately layered, masterfully constructed puzzlebox/ mindfuck. But it could have been just an exercise in cerebral gamesmanship, a caper film, had Nolan not, as always, buried a dark and complex emotional secret at the core. The pacing is not flawless, but it’s pretty damned good. And the movie has a pleasurably, maddeningly ambiguous ending that people will argue about for years. Just as enjoyable on repeat viewing, because then you can admire how well it all fits together. Highly recommended.

Only Nolan could make a kick-ass nail-biting suspense movie about psychological catharsis... and get away with it. Someone else could have made a movie about a guy talking to his therapist to accomplish the same goal, but this is a lot more exciting!

On a surface level, this movie is about lucid dreaming and Jungian psychology. But it’s far more a story about the storyteller’s art, an examination of the creative process itself, which I find even more fascinating. For what is art about if not the generative and reactive process, the creation and realization of ideas, and what does art do if not implant an idea in the mind of the viewer... Filmmakers, like dream architects, strive for verisimilitude, to pull you into a story and convince you that it matters--that it's real, even if it could never happen. Inception brilliantly probes the paradox of its own invention.

More movies and series of 2010 )

Profile

corvideye: (Default)
corvideye

December 2016

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 18th, 2025 06:09 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios