corvideye: (apples)
I had a dream where I was in a group taking a bunch of health evaluations, some also related to psychology/ perception. They were done in a verbal/visual format, where I would look at a diagram or diorama and describe my reaction to it, such as a scale of how tired you feel on an average day. I was struggling with some of it, because the diagrams just weren’t logical, didn’t make sense to me, and I kept having to ask for clarification, and feeling embarrassed because it was designed to seem quite simple to most people, and I was apparently overthinking it. Then we had a perception test question about two guys who had to divide up some colored crayons in a certain way, a logic puzzle where it's not possible for them to have identical sets. One man wanted one of every color, while the other didn’t care if he had some color duplicates, such as two white crayons. The woman giving the test then said, “What do you think of that?” I realized that the best answer was that the result was “not fair, but equitable.” She seemed quite surprised that I had come up with that, and wasn’t even too clear on the meaning herself. I was seeing the fine distinction of meaning that ‘fair’ meant in an absolute, empirical way: everyone gets exactly the same things. Whereas ‘equitable’ meant symmetry, balance, both sides are happy, even if what they get is not of identical worth.

Upon waking, I don't think the words really carry that exact distinction, but I find it interesting... and now I kind of wish they did. It would be a tidy expression of absolute vs. situational morality. Not everyone can get the same things, but that's sometimes okay, because not everyone wants the same things, either...

I suppose it's not too surprising that my subconscious continues to kick around nuances of word meaning even when I'm asleep!
corvideye: (tummy rub)
I have a Couch of Requirement. This is not to say that my couch produces things I want... usually the opposite, in fact. But it is a couch upon which Mama cat requires me to be. Loudly, vociferously, insistently, and unyieldingly, I am summoned to sit upon the damn couch. Not in the office. Not at the table. On. The. Couch. Along with Mama's blanky, her stuffed peep, her fuzzy ball, her robot hamster, and her other objects of fixation.

I'm telling you: cats have Asperger's.
corvideye: (gyr)
We're going to Denver for the Rocky Mountain Fiction Writers' Conference! 'We' because [livejournal.com profile] hrothgar1 fabulously offered to come along for hand-holding/butt-kicking and general expediting purposes. Bought the plane ticket and hotel res (could have saved money seeking crash space or a cheaper hotel, but this will simplify the logistics, give M somewhere to hang out and me somewhere to retreat to). Will sign up for the conference as soon as possible. Hope my boss agrees to give me the 2 days off!! I emailed her, but she's out of town, so I haven't heard back yet.

I've never been to Colorado (not that I'm going to see much of it). Hope the mile-high elevation doesn't cause us too much trouble.

Thank you to everyone for your encouragement so far. Your unanimous and vocal recommendation command to go is a huge part of what tipped this from hypothetical to happening. Having your web of readily accessible support via LJ is a powerful aid that I didn't have the other two times I went through this process.

The conference is Sept. 12-14. Expect a lot of venting/ whining/ rambling/ jittering/ analysis etc. as I get psyched up for this.
corvideye: (Default)
The level of writing ability in the news these days... sometimes I don't know whether to laugh or cry.

"Oregon’s oceanic shoreline is one of the most dramatic and dynamic places on the planet, along with its infamy for pristine, unspoiled beauty."

Yeah, we like to live in infamy, too.

"Calin Chi Wong is charged with making written threats to kill or do bodily injury via the computer."

Oh, those dangerous computers. Put the monitor down!
corvideye: (smile)
A person could hurt themselves looking at this site...

http://www.engrish.com

I particularly recommend the sections "bags/packaging", "cars," "clothing", and "chinglish".

Along these lines, some peculiar names for Japanese-made pens we have gotten at work: sindbat, at you spica (or, as I like to say, "Here's spica at you, kid"), and (I am not making this up) dong-a-shabity. All I can say is, these must sound much sexier in Japanese.
corvideye: (Default)
While most of us are pretty good at research and probably know most of this (though I did learn at least one new tip from the comments), I think this is an excellent article to show to beginning researchers (especially since increasingly these days, the internet is the ONLY place people do their research, sigh).

This totally parallels my experiences working at a retail help desk, where we do a lot of very diverse problem-solving (that beef jerky thing, for instance): when people approach a source of information, the problem is that they very often ask for what they think is the solution, rather than asking what would achieve the desired result. So if a customer comes up and says, "Do you have product x," and we respond, "No," and delve no further, they go away unsatisfied. But if we probe a bit into what they want to DO with product x, we can very likely suggest another brand, or another solution that involves products or methods they didn't even know existed. (We may also find out that they aren't even using the right term for what they want, because they don't know enough about the subject--like when people ask for "lacquer", most of the time they do not in fact mean a coating based on insect or tree resin. Similarly, I might go to a hardware store and ask for a certain type of fastener, because it's the only one I know by name, when there might be another kind that would work much better.) Trouble is, some people don't stick around long enough for that.

A related problem for the reference person is that the more you know about a subject, often the more ambiguous the answer becomes, and so the harder it is to respond decisively. To take a recent example, when someone asks for "bond paper"--the more you know about paper, the harder it is to say what this actually means, because the term has historically been used so variously and broadly as to be essentially meaningless. It means what you want it to mean. The question is, what did the source want it to mean? Which brings us back to context--what do you want to use it for? (Which customers don't always want to go into, and I can understand that, given the types of projects I'm often engaged in: "Uh, so I can replicate dead people's underwear...")
corvideye: (Default)
Today at work:

customer: "Do you have any more of these Bic mechanical pencils?"
me: "Which ones do you mean?" (we have, oh, about 30 kinds of Bic mechanical pencils.)
customer: "The ones you're out of."
(insert sound of headdesk here)


Adding that to the list of fav customer questions, along with (all actual questions asked in complete seriousness by actual customers!):

"Is this the color I'm thinking of?"

"Is this the color of my walls at home?"

"What's so magic about a Magic Rub eraser?"

(looking at supply list that calls for a bone folder) "How do you fold a bone?"

"Why would prices go up?"

"Why would the price of gas affect the price of paper?"

and my all time favorite....

"What kind of glue should I use to bezel-set some beef jerky?"

Profile

corvideye: (Default)
corvideye

December 2016

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 5th, 2025 07:16 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios